Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release naming and older versions #2026

Closed
wmcnCG opened this issue Nov 3, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Release naming and older versions #2026

wmcnCG opened this issue Nov 3, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@wmcnCG
Copy link

wmcnCG commented Nov 3, 2023

Is there a way to access older releases? Why are they being removed?

I use a script to setup new machines with OpenRadioss and I often have to update the download link because the release is no longer available (this would be solved if the most recent release was always available at https://github.com/OpenRadioss/OpenRadioss/releases/download/latest/OpenRadioss_linux64.zip).

Besides this minor inconvenience, I think older releases should remain available for reproducibility.

@PaulAltair
Copy link
Contributor

The suggestion of having a fixed URL for the 'latest' packaged version is a good one in my opinion, I will suggest to see if we can do that. Regarding retaining 'older' versions, OpenRadioss is effectively versionless, every pull request updates the code and there is no real specific identifier for a 'release', retaining old versions would mean keeping a copy of the download for every pull request. If you want to retain a 'version' for use later, or across multiple machines. You can obviously reuse the packaged version you downloaded. Or if you create your own fork, it remains at the state in which you forked it, until you specifically sync it back up with the main repository updates.

@OpenRadioss OpenRadioss locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 7, 2023
@laurent-altr laurent-altr converted this issue into discussion #2044 Nov 7, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants