When migrating from JUnit to AssertJ, rely on context to provide better assertions

[rahulsom]

What problem are you trying to solve?

I'm converting JUnit assertions to AssertJ assertions.

Describe the solution you'd like

In the example here - https://docs.openrewrite.org/recipes/java/testing/assertj/junitasserttruetoassertthat

assertTrue(notification() != null && notification() > 0);

is turned into

assertThat(notification() != null && notification() > 0).isTrue();

The more useful conversion would be

assertThat(notification()).isNotNull().isGreaterThan(0)

Have you considered any alternatives or workarounds?

N/A

Additional context

Are you interested in contributing this feature to OpenRewrite?

[timtebeek]

Hi @rahulsom , thanks for reporting this suggestion here! It sounds like this issue could tie in with the work being done on #348, which will make it's way into our AssertJ best practices. In particular I think we can split the && first into two assertion statements, and then collapse those statements using the recipe developed in #373.