Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider whether other non-ehrQL features need implementing for the booster effectiveness study #484

Closed
benbc opened this issue May 11, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
CIPHA Work needed for the CIPHA booster effectiveness study

Comments

@benbc
Copy link
Contributor

benbc commented May 11, 2022

Do we need to implement other features to support this study, for example measures?

@benbc benbc added the CIPHA Work needed for the CIPHA booster effectiveness study label May 11, 2022
@evansd
Copy link
Contributor

evansd commented May 18, 2022

Have confirmed with Will that measures are not required. Will have a think about whether there's anything else that needs considering and then will close.

@evansd
Copy link
Contributor

evansd commented Jun 6, 2022

Interpreting "needs" strictly and saying that as long as we can extract data for the study in CSV format we're OK, I think there aren't any other features we need.

Binary output formats, dummy data validation (and indeed dummy data generation) are all high priority but not on the critical path here I think.

@evansd evansd closed this as completed Jun 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CIPHA Work needed for the CIPHA booster effectiveness study
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants