Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG]org.opensearch.search.aggregations.bucket.terms.TermsAggregatorTests.testSimpleAggregationLowCardinality is flaky #12640

Open
reta opened this issue Mar 13, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #12643 · May be fixed by #13567
Open
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working flaky-test Random test failure that succeeds on second run Search:Aggregations

Comments

@reta
Copy link
Collaborator

reta commented Mar 13, 2024

Describe the bug

The test case org.opensearch.search.aggregations.bucket.terms.TermsAggregatorTests.testSimpleAggregationLowCardinality is flaky:

java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<4> but was:<0>
	at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([498FC1DA720942E0:D5D3BCE846DC749C]:0)
	at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)
	at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:835)
	at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:647)
	at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:633)
	at org.opensearch.search.aggregations.bucket.terms.TermsAggregatorTests.testSimple(TermsAggregatorTests.java:412)
	at org.opensearch.search.aggregations.bucket.terms.TermsAggregatorTests.testSimpleAggregationLowCardinality(TermsAggregatorTests.java:307)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1750)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:938)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:974)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:988)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
	at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
	at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:48)
	at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
	at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
	at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
	at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
	at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:947)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:832)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:883)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:894)
	at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
	at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
	at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
	at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
	at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
	at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
	at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
	at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
	at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)

Related component

Search:Aggregations

To Reproduce

./gradlew ':server:test' --tests "org.opensearch.search.aggregations.bucket.terms.TermsAggregatorTests.testSimpleAggregationLowCardinality" 

Expected behavior

The test must always pass

Additional Details

Plugins
Standard

Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

Host/Environment (please complete the following information):

  • CI

Additional context

@reta reta added bug Something isn't working untriaged labels Mar 13, 2024
@reta reta added flaky-test Random test failure that succeeds on second run and removed Search:Aggregations labels Mar 13, 2024
@reta
Copy link
Collaborator Author

reta commented Mar 13, 2024

@sandeshkr419 could you please take a look? I suspect it caused by #11643, thank you

@sandeshkr419
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for bringing this up @reta. I have raised PR #12643 for the fix now.

@getsaurabh02
Copy link
Member

@sandeshkr419 do you want to take a look again?

@sandeshkr419
Copy link
Contributor

I was not able to reproduce it but looks like it may be that more than 1 segment are created during document addition in the index. Let me revisit this and see if I can make the index creation part a bit more strict or change some assertions.

@sandeshkr419 sandeshkr419 linked a pull request May 6, 2024 that will close this issue
8 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working flaky-test Random test failure that succeeds on second run Search:Aggregations
Projects
Status: 🏗 In progress
5 participants