Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consider pathway types (including loops) rather than entrances during linking #1006

Closed
abyrd opened this issue Mar 8, 2013 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@abyrd
Copy link
Member

abyrd commented Mar 8, 2013

pathways.txt proposal:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/gtfs-changes/JBAT5iFqAlY/discussion

"Pathways of type 1 connect stops and the entrances that give them
access from/to the streets. A stop referenced by a pathway of type 1
can no longer be accessed directly from the streets (i.e., without
using an entrance), unless a circular pathway from the stop to itself
is given to reinstate direct access. Pathways of type 2 describe
pathways for transfers between stops that are separate from the
streets (e.g., a tunnel between two subway platforms). Pathways of
type 3 provide information about transfers on the streets, for use by
transit trip planners instead of, or in addition to, walking
directions from other sources."

We currently just check whether stops are connected to entrances. Instead we should check which pathway types reference them, and whether they have pathways to themselves.

@abyrd
Copy link
Member Author

abyrd commented Oct 15, 2020

This should be revisited when the new pathways proposal is finalized.

@abyrd abyrd closed this as completed Oct 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants