You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to propose a SIG dedicated to maintaining information about available credential formats for the benefit of OWF projects and the wider community. The topic is more complex than one might assume on first sight, since there are more than 14 formats for representing digital credentials and most of those formats can be combined with different signature algorithms, ways to represent cryptographic keys (with alone more than a hundred DID methods), status management methods, trust management methods and so on.
There is pre-existing work started at Internet Identity Workshop (IIW 34, Spring 2022) and extended and augmented during Rebooting the Web of Trust (RWOT-XI, The Hague, Sept 2022).
It consists of a sheet, the “credential format comparison matrix”, containing information about the technical options in the different dimensions (formats, signature algorithms, …) as well as known credential profiles, i.e. concrete combinations used in implementations and an article explaining the “matrix”.
The sheet is maintained by an informal group of maintainers, who would donate it to the new SIG in order to give it a long term home. Those maintainers would also be willed to continue their work to maintain the information and are seeking for more contributors.
Objectives
The aim of the SIG is to provide information and tools to facilitate transparency of the technical options regarding credential formats and adjacent technologies in order to allow for comparison and effective decision making on credential formats.
List of deliverables or work products (optional)
The SIG shall maintain, evolve, and publish the credential format comparison matrix based on contributions from the wider identity community.
Leader
Mirko Molik
Initial Participant List
Paul Bastian
Mirko Molik
Maaike van Leuken
Andre Kudra
Torsten Lodderstedt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Am 24. Juni 2023, 13:33 +0200 schrieb Mirko Mollik ***@***.***>:
@tkuhrt can you create a github repo so I can fill it with content?
@tlodderstedt you haven't created already one, have you?
I haven’t.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
Introduction/background material
I would like to propose a SIG dedicated to maintaining information about available credential formats for the benefit of OWF projects and the wider community. The topic is more complex than one might assume on first sight, since there are more than 14 formats for representing digital credentials and most of those formats can be combined with different signature algorithms, ways to represent cryptographic keys (with alone more than a hundred DID methods), status management methods, trust management methods and so on.
There is pre-existing work started at Internet Identity Workshop (IIW 34, Spring 2022) and extended and augmented during Rebooting the Web of Trust (RWOT-XI, The Hague, Sept 2022).
It consists of a sheet, the “credential format comparison matrix”, containing information about the technical options in the different dimensions (formats, signature algorithms, …) as well as known credential profiles, i.e. concrete combinations used in implementations and an article explaining the “matrix”.
Sheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1X93ptJcmfX1NZEo5E7ElnqJ-knDS4Dj6JOYSJ_2PsUw
Article: https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rwot11-the-hague/blob/master/final-documents/credential-profile-comparison.pdf
Source Code: https://github.com/vcstuff/credential-profile-comparison
The sheet is maintained by an informal group of maintainers, who would donate it to the new SIG in order to give it a long term home. Those maintainers would also be willed to continue their work to maintain the information and are seeking for more contributors.
Objectives
The aim of the SIG is to provide information and tools to facilitate transparency of the technical options regarding credential formats and adjacent technologies in order to allow for comparison and effective decision making on credential formats.
List of deliverables or work products (optional)
The SIG shall maintain, evolve, and publish the credential format comparison matrix based on contributions from the wider identity community.
Leader
Mirko Molik
Initial Participant List
Paul Bastian
Mirko Molik
Maaike van Leuken
Andre Kudra
Torsten Lodderstedt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: