-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Using upToConstant with complex numbers #1013
Comments
I looked into this a little. The Line 190 in 9cefdf9
I didn't keep thinking about it more though. Maybe they can be elevated to support complex contexts. I'm not sure what your immediate needs are, but a custom checker could take the student answer and subtract |
As it turns out, I realized after submitting the bug report that I didn't actually need it right now. But it is still surprising that |
As Alex points out, the Unfortunately, Note that the traditional |
Thanks! I didn't get a chance to try this out this semester, but I will the next time I teach complex. Do you plan to incorporate this into the main webwork distribution? |
In Complex context, it appears that
upToConstant
still thinks that all constants are real. If the correct answer is2xy
and is checkedupToConstant
, then2xy+1
is marked correct, but2xy+i
is marked incorrect.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: