Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OOM catalog #1497

Closed
kfox1111 opened this issue May 2, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

OOM catalog #1497

kfox1111 opened this issue May 2, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@kfox1111
Copy link

kfox1111 commented May 2, 2020

I started a minikube with 8g of ram.

I installed the olm:

curl -sL https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager/releases/download/0.14.1/install.sh | bash -s 0.14.1

Most things came up but the catalog was in a crash loop for a while:
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
catalog-operator-86f777cc59-4qrq7 1/1 Running 0 16m
olm-operator-5fd48d8cd4-gcm44 1/1 Running 0 16m
operatorhubio-catalog-ghkjm 0/1 Running 7 16m
packageserver-75946c9b59-2wrmj 1/1 Running 0 16m
packageserver-75946c9b59-vnfjw 1/1 Running 0 16m

doing a minikube ssh dmesg:
[ 738.836068] Memory cgroup out of memory: Kill process 10034 (registry-server) score 2018 or sacrifice child
[ 738.836350] Killed process 10034 (registry-server) total-vm:195796kB, anon-rss:92640kB, file-rss:14324kB, shmem-rss:0kB

There is plenty of ram left on the system, so it seems like the limit set on the pod is too low.

@AndrienkoAleksandr
Copy link

operatorhubio-catalog-ghkjm 0/1 Running 7 16m

+1. operatorhubio-catalog is very unstable and
CrashLoopBackOff restarting...

@kfox1111 kfox1111 changed the title OOM catalog OLM catalog May 4, 2020
@kfox1111 kfox1111 changed the title OLM catalog OOM catalog May 4, 2020
@andresmgot
Copy link

I am also finding this issue. I see it was fixed here: #1389

But the latest release (0.14.2) doesn't include this change. When can we expect a new release? I am using latest for the moment for the image in the catalog-operator deployment but that's far from ideal.

I see in this comment: #1415 (comment) that @ecordell is planning a release, any update?

@kfox1111
Copy link
Author

kfox1111 commented Jun 9, 2020

I think this is fixed, or at least worked around in 0.15+.

@kfox1111 kfox1111 closed this as completed Jun 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants