Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

net/wireguard: Local Configuration - Maximum number of instances reached #2759

Closed
astuckey123 opened this issue Jan 21, 2022 · 4 comments · Fixed by #2760
Closed

net/wireguard: Local Configuration - Maximum number of instances reached #2759

astuckey123 opened this issue Jan 21, 2022 · 4 comments · Fixed by #2760
Labels
incomplete Issue template missing info

Comments

@astuckey123
Copy link

It looks like we are hard-coding the maximum number of WG local configurations to 20.
Can this be increased, or the limitation be removed altogether?
I haven't been able to find any evidence so far on an actual limitation within WG itself (could be lack of googling skill here too, so happy to stand corrected)

@OPNsense-bot
Copy link

Thank you for creating an issue.
Since the ticket doesn't seem to be using one of our templates, we're marking this issue as low priority until further notice.

For more information about the policies for this repository,
please read https://github.com/opnsense/plugins/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md for further details.

The easiest option to gain traction is to close this ticket and open a new one using one of our templates.

@OPNsense-bot OPNsense-bot added the incomplete Issue template missing info label Jan 21, 2022
@mimugmail
Copy link
Member

mimugmail commented Jan 21, 2022

You know that you dont need acseparate instance for every s2s? Cant imagine you need more than 5 :)

I came from early days where WireGuard itself was unstable

@astuckey123
Copy link
Author

You know that you dont need acseparate instance for every s2s? Cant imagine you need more than 5 :)

I came from early days where WireGuard itself was unstable

Lots of BGP and OSPF international overlay networking over multiple clouds and on-prem sites where they each need their own interfaces and policies, but you are right, can probably squeeze some things into single WG local's.

@mimugmail
Copy link
Member

Cool :) next version wont come with any limits. Maybe you want to Share your setup in a blogpost. Always nice to see how others are using OPNsense :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
incomplete Issue template missing info
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants