MVP brain storm

[geeksesi]

Hello there,
we deal with the MVP version and then start to lunch the product.

I'll talk about my idea and willing. feel free to tell about yours.

[geeksesi]

who is the user

• somebody has a pull request ( in his repository on others ) and needs a senior to review the code and guide him to make it better. - we called Junior
• somebody has an open-source project with some open pull request and need somebody else to review the pull requests and help to merge them. - we called Busy man
• somebody who is willing to increase community and opensource activity - we called Reviewer

how users integrate

• Junior can make a direct request.
• Busy man can attach his repository then we will list his pull requests on the website
• Reviewer will watch the requests ( with filters ) and submit his review on Github/Gitlab/others 🤔

automation things

• extract detail of the pull request, project, user for better filtering and experience.
• handle status of the pull request, open, closed, merged
• watch the repositories pull requests and list them on site.

[abbasudo]

isn't it better to simplify Junior and Busy man and Reviewer to actions not type of user?
something like stack overflow. each user can make a Request and can Respond to others requests. each request can be labeled as private repo open source review help code snippet etc.

[geeksesi]

there not user type things.
we just called them. not typed them :))