Calling Object walker from another domain

[kTipSSIoYv]

Any idea how to call Obejct_Walker from another domain? I'm trying to execute "Object_walker" during post provision.

I'm trying to use the value /Investigative_Debugging/Discovery/ObjectWalker/object_walker under the following rel and meth's but none of them work.

[kTipSSIoYv]

Update: It seems like nothing is happening when the object walker runs. This is during VMware VM provisioning.

I used the following value under common_meth1

/Investigative_Debugging/Discovery/ObjectWalker.object_walker

[root@eb63bdeee3a7 ~]# tail -f /var/www/miq/vmdb/log/automation.log  | grep -iE 'walker|error'
[----] I, [2023-02-23T11:56:18.338379 #316:8cdc]  INFO -- automation: Q-task_id([r49_miq_provision_142]) Invoking [inline] method [/Investigative_Debugging/Discovery/ObjectWalker/object_walker] with inputs [{}]
[----] I, [2023-02-23T11:56:18.340660 #316:8cdc]  INFO -- automation: Q-task_id([r49_miq_provision_142]) <AEMethod [/Investigative_Debugging/Discovery/ObjectWalker/object_walker]> Starting
[----] I, [2023-02-23T11:56:18.847581 #316:8cdc]  INFO -- automation: Q-task_id([r49_miq_provision_142]) <AEMethod [/Investigative_Debugging/Discovery/ObjectWalker/object_walker]> Ending

Any idea what's the issue?

Update 2:

The following works if I add it to CatalogItemInitialization but doesn't work under PostProvisioing.

/Investigative_Debugging/Discovery/ObjectWalker/object_walker (type: state)

[pemcg]

The syntax that you have that works, i.e. /Investigative_Debugging/Discovery/ObjectWalker/object_walker is the one to use.
@Fryguy The code is quite hacky and I never really considered it production quality enough to submit for the ManageIQ domain. In any case I think it won't work very well when logging is directed to journald (I think that's the plan?). Certainly the object_walker_reader tool - which is by far the best way to read the output - won't work any more.

[Fryguy]

ObjectWalker is not part of the ManageIQ domain. @pemcg, can you help out here? (Total aside, is there any reason we can't put this in the ManageIQ domain?)