"Reinventing cosmology: New research puts age of universe at 26.7 - not 13.7 - billion years" using tired-light #102
Replies: 4 comments 13 replies
-
26.7 -- not 13.7 -- billion years That's actually an old (1992) statement: see formula (13) in FLAT SPACETIME COSMOLOGY by Jayant Narlikar and Halton Arp, where it reads This result is also mentioned in "Big Bang: Tweak it or throw it out? ": we easily find that UpdateZwicky's tired light theory proposes that the redshift of light from distant galaxies is due to the gradual loss of energy by photons over vast cosmic distances. [ .. ] Gupta found that "by allowing this theory to coexist with the expanding universe, it becomes possible to reinterpret the redshift as a hybrid phenomenon, rather than purely due to expansion." Stop talking! Calculate! Let the expanding universe redshift be where Which is the same result as obtained with our Variable Mass Theory. Gupta proceeds with the idea of evolving "coupling constants," as hypothesized by Paul Dirac, thereby making his theory even more (and IMHO unnecessary) complicated. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
“Age” was based on CMB “data” and the assumption that CMB is the proof of expanding universe. Now if “age” is almost double then CMB is no more the proof of expanding universe. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Firstly the idea that tired light models do not fit the Hubble diagram is IMO wrong, is there something I'm missing out? He did not give a single source despite being the reason of existence of his model. In summary Gupta paper doesn't provide convincing added value over TL besides complexity, moreover it can be clearly seen from his graph that his curve seems to be a poorer fit of the angular distance test than TL alone. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That's no longer true. There is at least this 2021 study showing it: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
"Our universe could be twice as old as current estimates, according to a new study that challenges the dominant cosmological model and sheds new light on the so-called 'impossible early galaxy problem.' "
🔗 https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/07/230711133118.htm
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions