Replies: 6 comments 16 replies
-
Thank you @dai-shi . I really appreciate your constructive feedback. The overall app design does need improvement indeed. Acknowledging that this is not an area I'm good at, I have opened an issue here asking for help. I understand the request for a simple mode with limited features and less bloat. examples: I have not revisited this for a while. Do you think using the monaco editor with this mode covers your use case? I'm really grateful for you giving time to help improve LiveCodes. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
So, it feels like livecodes provides almost everything I need.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
In case you find this useful, this is the default config: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
updated this issue (#539) to ask for help improving visual design and provide mock for UI to facilitate style edits. Also posted on twitter: https://x.com/hatem_hosny_/status/1773104699941462361?s=20 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
hi @dai-shi The overall app design is still yet to be addressed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This is now released as v27 and is the current version running on livecodes.io In addition, the SDK is also updated to v0.5 0 to use new configuration options. Thank you. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks to some improvements, personally, I'm fairly comfortable with the current experience. But, it's a little bit hard for me to recommend it to others. (Especially, compared to stackblitz.) It's just my personal feeling and I think there's nothing wrong in livecodes. Still, I thought I should open this discussion.
There seems two aspects to overcome.
I'm really bad at those things, and can't help much. But maybe something like "simple mode" might do.
For instance, I'm pretty happy with the simple design and limited capability provided by https://code.esm.sh/.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions