-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Target RF-Performance is not optimal #3
Comments
orgua
changed the title
Target RF-Performance is sub-optimal
Target RF-Performance is not optimal
Oct 2, 2023
Switched Antenna of Node 9 & 10 (just initial test):
New Antennas now on Node 8 & 12 (in Hope to close the Gaps):
Additional new Ant on Node 1 & 7:
Baseline from first Post:
|
Current Baseline
Node 9 & 10 - replace chip-ant with 5/8-whip
Shorten to 1/4-whip
Going back to Baseline ChipAntenna
|
Add two Nodes
replaced Target 14
move Node 14
Updated Floorplan (WIP)
|
RUN AChanges to above picture / last comment:
Goal:
RUN BChanges:
RUN CChanges:
RUN DChange:
Updated Floorplan (2023-11-17) |
Update:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Testbed should be a ring-network, but there are still two gaps.
possible Reasons
Pattern Chip Antenna
Measurements (link-matrix)
baseline
change node 1, 8 (orientation 180°, pos)
change node 3, 7 (orientation 180°, pos)
change node 3, 8 (higher, 20cm, above screens)
change node 1, (+90°)
other part of network
(node 7 & 1 were included, but had no connection)
Todo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: