Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request to add information on the overhead of using logger library standalone and with Timber integration #253

Open
donenoyes opened this issue Jun 21, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@donenoyes
Copy link

On README, if possible please include details on overhead, performance related information. Is using Standalone Logger library more performant than using it with Timber and Logger integration. Please add info with reason.

Also, is Logger standalone and Timber and Logger integration more performant than Timber standalone?

I understand the usecase is to make Logs beautiful. But this information would be useful as well. If its not possible to include in README, please add here.
Thank you.

@donenoyes donenoyes changed the title Request to add information on the overhead of using logger library standalong and with Timber integration Request to add information on the overhead of using logger library standalone and with Timber integration Jun 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant