Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore inconsistent timings on some comparison tests #79

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 29, 2021

Conversation

juliangilbey
Copy link
Contributor

Two particular tests have timings that differ wildly between successive runs on arm64 architectures. This might be because some libraries take a long time to load or something like that - I don't know. But this patch turns off hypothesis's timing checks for these two tests. I'm going to apply it to Debian's package; you might or might not want to apply it upstream.

…s differ wildly between successive tests on arm64
@orsinium orsinium merged commit 5f3a0dc into life4:master Nov 29, 2021
@juliangilbey
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks Gram! This is it for the patches - it now builds fine on Debian.

@orsinium
Copy link
Member

Great! Could you try to add 3.10 on CI, please?

@juliangilbey
Copy link
Contributor Author

Erm, I don't know what CI system you're using, I'm afraid. Is it perhaps .drone.star, which would just require adding appropriate lines? There's also Taskfile.yml which might be relevant, but I'm not sure.

@orsinium
Copy link
Member

Is it perhaps .drone.star, which would just require adding appropriate lines?

Yep, this one, it should be pretty simple.

No worries, if you don't have time, I can take care of it in a few days. You already did a valuable contribution :)

@juliangilbey
Copy link
Contributor Author

As I can't test it myself, I think it would be better if you can do it! And thanks again for writing this great package :-)

@juliangilbey juliangilbey deleted the ignore-hypothesis-timings branch September 4, 2022 11:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants