Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Solve trajectory projections using base year data #172

Open
MichaelTiemannOSC opened this issue Dec 14, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Solve trajectory projections using base year data #172

MichaelTiemannOSC opened this issue Dec 14, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@MichaelTiemannOSC
Copy link
Contributor

The current trajectory projection code looks at corp disclosures of typically recent era and projects the trends of up to five years of data. For some companies, we only have 3 or 4 good years of data. For many companies, the past 5 years produce trajectory projections that head up, not down, creating nonsense scores (as there's no way a company is going to be increasing projections at that rate for the next 30 years and the cumulative overshoot is just massive).

Many of those same companies with marginal gains over the past 5 years have made great progress since their "baseline" years (which go back much further: 2012, 2005, etc). If we do a linear interpolation of the ancient base year to the first year of "real" report data, the historic intensity projections might make a lot more sense.

We have the base year data due to targets, and it should be straightforward to project into 2016, 2017, 2018, or wherever our data picks up. It is a way to "fill the data gaps" given how difficult it is to find good disclosure data from 2014, 2015, etc.

Comments @LeylaJavadova @ImkeHorten @hmorgan29 @kmarinushkin

@MichaelTiemannOSC MichaelTiemannOSC added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 14, 2022
@ImkeHorten
Copy link

Hi Michael, sounds like a very good idea to me. Is this complex to implement?

@kmarinushkin
Copy link
Collaborator

I am a SW engineer, i am not the right person to ask.
I think, that methodologies should be specified by climate-change experts

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants