Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 3, 2020. It is now read-only.

Blocks Support (squashed commits from #152) #156

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

symroe
Copy link

@symroe symroe commented Sep 12, 2019

This PR is a duplicate of #152 but with a single commit rather than 4.

As Slack is pushing blocks as the default for complex messages, this PR is important for anyone reading the current docs and wanting to use Slacker with them.

@symroe symroe changed the title Blocks Support (squashd commits from #152) Blocks Support (squashed commits from #152) Oct 28, 2019
@symroe symroe mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2019
@botzill
Copy link

botzill commented Nov 12, 2019

OK, any idea who is responsable to merge this PR? Would be great to have this feature added. ]

@os ?

@botzill
Copy link

botzill commented Dec 11, 2019

Hi.

Still no one here to merge this PR?

@symroe
Copy link
Author

symroe commented Dec 11, 2019

I've been using it for about a month now, and it's working fine.

Low risk merge IMHO.

@botzill
Copy link

botzill commented Dec 11, 2019

I don't have the permission to merge.

@senpay
Copy link

senpay commented Jan 31, 2020

@symroe Hey! I decided to fork slacker for now and publish it under some other name in pypi. Please feel free to suggest your PR there - I will do my best to merge it timely and release (ETA~7 days)

@senpay
Copy link

senpay commented Jan 31, 2020

@os Hey! I am forking and will maintain the release of slacker for now under another name. As soon as you can get back to supporting slacker - ping me, we will back merge all what you think relevant.

symroe and others added 3 commits February 6, 2020 14:31
This commit adds support for message blocks.

Slack is moving towards this as the default method of posting
complex messages in future.

The blocks themselves are just another JSON object passed to the API, so
supporting them is simple.

This commit be @symroe was taken from
os#152, but with a single commit
message. @genghis should get the credit for the initial work.
@os
Copy link
Owner

os commented Feb 9, 2020

Thanks. There are many unrelated commits here so it's difficult to merge it as-is. Should we close this and create separate PRs for each change?

@symroe
Copy link
Author

symroe commented Feb 9, 2020

The unrelated ones are because I gave up on this PR after months of being ignored, and moved to the forked repo…

Happy for you to take it from here if you want to carry on supporting this code base, but I've moved my dependencies to the other fork 🤷‍♂

@symroe symroe closed this Feb 9, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants