You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the file "macros-discrete.tex" I define a boatload of new LaTeX macros to speed up typing. For example: \def\N{\mathbb N} so I get a nice blackboard N for the natural numbers. These definitions do not get implemented correctly in the mbx at some point along the way.
Would \newcommand{\N}{\mathbb N} fix the problem? Or is this a mathjax issue?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For future reference, it is better to have macros-discrete.tex input into
the main tex file, and not input within the .sty file.
On Fri, 1 Jul 2016, Oscar Levin wrote:
In the file "macros-descrete.tex" I define a boatload of new LaTeX macros to speed
up typing. For example: \def\N{\mathbb N} so I get a nice blackboard N for the
natural numbers. These definitions do not get implemented correctly in the mbx at
some point along the way.
Would \newcommand{\N}{\mathbb N} fix the problem? Or is this a mathjax issue?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the
thread.[AAM6LATHbP7GW0rMceTzQ7tkBm4Qx7qOks5qRYEpgaJpZM4JDet5.gif]
In the file "macros-discrete.tex" I define a boatload of new LaTeX macros to speed up typing. For example:
\def\N{\mathbb N}
so I get a nice blackboard N for the natural numbers. These definitions do not get implemented correctly in the mbx at some point along the way.Would
\newcommand{\N}{\mathbb N}
fix the problem? Or is this a mathjax issue?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: