Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add "explain element" (show properties) when tapping on it #16762

Open
sjvudp opened this issue Mar 22, 2023 · 9 comments
Open

Add "explain element" (show properties) when tapping on it #16762

sjvudp opened this issue Mar 22, 2023 · 9 comments
Labels
Nice to Have Should be fixed but there is no priority or no possibility to fix it within current horizon planning

Comments

@sjvudp
Copy link

sjvudp commented Mar 22, 2023

馃殌 feature request

Description

OsmAnd models roads to a great detail, but the disadvantage is that there exist over 20 types of roads with different symbols (according to the legend). Most users cannot remember those I'm afraid, specifically as legend and map cannot be displayed at the same time.
So I wondered whether and how that could be improved.

Describe the solution you'd like

My idea was that (long?) tapping on a part of a road would display its properties (like road type, road surface, slope, etc.) in text form.
Much like a "legend on demand", but not a generic one, but a specific one.

Of course that feature does not have to be restricted to roads.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Printing the legend(s) in color and carrying it along to look up what the symbols mean seems to be an out-of-time solution ;-)

@tradavyvy
Copy link

Great idea

@letypequividelespoubelles
Copy link
Contributor

Linked with #7741 (adapatble legend) and doublon with #11275, #11056, #2232

@Zirochkabila
Copy link
Collaborator

@sjvudp If I understood you correctly, similar functionality already exists https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/route-navigation#route-details

@sjvudp
Copy link
Author

sjvudp commented Mar 22, 2023

@sjvudp If I understood you correctly, similar functionality already exists https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/route-navigation#route-details

I know that, but my idea was independent of a route; actually it was about examining why a specific road wouldn't be used for navigation.

@tradavyvy
Copy link

And why not have it work for other map items then roads.
Is this park, orchard or forrest?
Is this swamp, march or heath?
Is this sand, mud or peble beach?
There is verry often more map info in the data then is (or should be) renderred for readability sake. But that info is often usefull for specific uses. How high is this campsite because in the valley it is now 42 degrees.
With a long press on a location you now get a 4 choise menu why not add an 'explain what is here' button.

@scaidermern
Copy link
Contributor

How high is this campsite because in the valley it is now 42 degrees.

This is possible with the altitude widget: https://osmand.net/blog/Elevation/#elevation-map-center-widget

Or by looking at the contour lines.

But not by tapping on a camp site (unless it has an ele=* tag).

@vshcherb vshcherb added the Nice to Have Should be fixed but there is no priority or no possibility to fix it within current horizon planning label Apr 1, 2023
@sjvudp
Copy link
Author

sjvudp commented May 7, 2023

But not by tapping on a camp site (unless it has an ele=* tag).

Of course one can only show the native properties of an object (not all properties derivable from related objects) (maybe Chat GPT can ;-)).

@sjvudp
Copy link
Author

sjvudp commented Jul 19, 2023

@sjvudp If I understood you correctly, similar functionality already exists https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/route-navigation#route-details

FYI: That link is broken (as of today)

@vshcherb
Copy link
Member

https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/setup/route-details

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Nice to Have Should be fixed but there is no priority or no possibility to fix it within current horizon planning
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants