Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion: Distinguish between paved and unpaved cycleways #6091

Open
cyclingcat opened this issue Sep 24, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Suggestion: Distinguish between paved and unpaved cycleways #6091

cyclingcat opened this issue Sep 24, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels
Nice to Have Should be fixed but there is no priority or no possibility to fix it within current horizon planning

Comments

@cyclingcat
Copy link

Hi there,

I often use Osmand when planning my cycling trips. When using my road bike I try to avoid unpaved roads which is currently impossible with cycleways as they are always shown as a blue dashed line, no matter of their surface. So my suggestion is to distinguish cycleways in a similar way at it is done with tracks, where the paved ones are marked with a solid line and the unpaved ones with dashed lines. For example, cycleways tagged with "surface=paved", "surface=asphalt", "tracktype=grade1" or similar could be shown as a solid blue line, while any other cycleways (including those with no information about its surface) keep their current appearance as dashed blue lines.

This would improve the app a lot for road cyclists as they can use cycleways if they are known to be paved.

The cycling cat

@cyclingcat cyclingcat changed the title Suggesion: Distinguish between paved and unpaved cycleways Suggestion: Distinguish between paved and unpaved cycleways Sep 24, 2018
@vshcherb vshcherb added the Nice to Have Should be fixed but there is no priority or no possibility to fix it within current horizon planning label Sep 30, 2018
@quax2712
Copy link

This problem could be solved by creating a own
render.xml File.
Good examples could be found at
https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd-resources/tree/master/rendering_styles
I used mapnik and added new display type for all paved good ways a black, blue (cycleways) ore brown (grade2) interrupted line.

modified
new_track_view

OSM Standard
osm_standard_viewphoto_2018-10-15_15-33-12

a nother example with some cycleways (blue)
some cycleways

@cyclingcat
Copy link
Author

cyclingcat commented Oct 20, 2018

Great to read that this would be possible quite easily. However, I would suggest a similar scheme as the one used for tracks: solid lines for paved cycleways, dashed lines for unpaved ones (just in blue in order to distinguish the different kinds of ways).

The cycling cat

@cyclingcat
Copy link
Author

Hi there,

some days ago a fellow road biker asked me exactly the same: "Is it possible to distinguish between paved roads (suitable for road bikes) and unpaved cycling paths with OsmAnd the way it is possible with e.g. agricultural tracks"? So I recalled this issue I opened a while ago covering the same request and it seemed that it would be quite easy to implement... is there any chance that this enhancement will be implemented at some time?

The cycling cat

@mikehgentry
Copy link

If cyclosm.org shows what you want, that's selectable as a map source (tile) in osmand. Shame it isn't vector, but it's better than nothing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Nice to Have Should be fixed but there is no priority or no possibility to fix it within current horizon planning
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants