You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I often use Osmand when planning my cycling trips. When using my road bike I try to avoid unpaved roads which is currently impossible with cycleways as they are always shown as a blue dashed line, no matter of their surface. So my suggestion is to distinguish cycleways in a similar way at it is done with tracks, where the paved ones are marked with a solid line and the unpaved ones with dashed lines. For example, cycleways tagged with "surface=paved", "surface=asphalt", "tracktype=grade1" or similar could be shown as a solid blue line, while any other cycleways (including those with no information about its surface) keep their current appearance as dashed blue lines.
This would improve the app a lot for road cyclists as they can use cycleways if they are known to be paved.
The cycling cat
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
cyclingcat
changed the title
Suggesion: Distinguish between paved and unpaved cycleways
Suggestion: Distinguish between paved and unpaved cycleways
Sep 24, 2018
vshcherb
added
the
Nice to Have
Should be fixed but there is no priority or no possibility to fix it within current horizon planning
label
Sep 30, 2018
This problem could be solved by creating a own
render.xml File.
Good examples could be found at https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd-resources/tree/master/rendering_styles
I used mapnik and added new display type for all paved good ways a black, blue (cycleways) ore brown (grade2) interrupted line.
Great to read that this would be possible quite easily. However, I would suggest a similar scheme as the one used for tracks: solid lines for paved cycleways, dashed lines for unpaved ones (just in blue in order to distinguish the different kinds of ways).
some days ago a fellow road biker asked me exactly the same: "Is it possible to distinguish between paved roads (suitable for road bikes) and unpaved cycling paths with OsmAnd the way it is possible with e.g. agricultural tracks"? So I recalled this issue I opened a while ago covering the same request and it seemed that it would be quite easy to implement... is there any chance that this enhancement will be implemented at some time?
Hi there,
I often use Osmand when planning my cycling trips. When using my road bike I try to avoid unpaved roads which is currently impossible with cycleways as they are always shown as a blue dashed line, no matter of their surface. So my suggestion is to distinguish cycleways in a similar way at it is done with tracks, where the paved ones are marked with a solid line and the unpaved ones with dashed lines. For example, cycleways tagged with "surface=paved", "surface=asphalt", "tracktype=grade1" or similar could be shown as a solid blue line, while any other cycleways (including those with no information about its surface) keep their current appearance as dashed blue lines.
This would improve the app a lot for road cyclists as they can use cycleways if they are known to be paved.
The cycling cat
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: