Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Online trip recording UI claims to ouput HDOP when it actually is R95 (-ish) #6325

Open
17320 opened this issue Dec 1, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Online trip recording UI claims to ouput HDOP when it actually is R95 (-ish) #6325

17320 opened this issue Dec 1, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
Nice to Have Should be fixed but there is no priority or no possibility to fix it within current horizon planning

Comments

@17320
Copy link

17320 commented Dec 1, 2018

As seen in the screenshot, the UI refers to the estimated precision value as hdop, whereas it actually isn't, as is very thoroughly explained in #3445.

I understand the issue with the lack of a standard GPX field for recording precision figures, but I found this screen misleading as I assumed that it was in fact HDOP.

screenshot_20181201-154057

May I ask whether the hint could be changed to show something else than hdop so as to avoid confusion in the future?
@vshcherb vshcherb added the Nice to Have Should be fixed but there is no priority or no possibility to fix it within current horizon planning label Dec 11, 2018
@vshcherb
Copy link
Member

If you would like to change only the hint, please create a pull-request so it could speed up the processing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Nice to Have Should be fixed but there is no priority or no possibility to fix it within current horizon planning
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@vshcherb @17320