Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VCTCXO taming #8

Closed
zimler opened this issue Jul 21, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

VCTCXO taming #8

zimler opened this issue Jul 21, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@zimler
Copy link

zimler commented Jul 21, 2016

I was reading this issue Nuand/bladeRF#414 and I was wondering if bladeGPS is able to use a 1PPS or 10MHz inputs (1.8V) via J71-1 for better accuracy. If so, had you been using a device to do this? I am new to this world, so maybe this isn't even applicable here.

@osqzss
Copy link
Owner

osqzss commented Jul 21, 2016

It is not implemented but certainly applicable. However, the factory calibrated VCTCXO on the bladeRF is reasonably accurate and stable, and there is no trouble to run the simulator without an external reference.

@zimler
Copy link
Author

zimler commented Jul 22, 2016

OK, that makes sense. I read further in the original article and that was talking about using a hackrf, not the bladerf and the hackrf not being accurate enough so they needed an external 10mhz generator.

thanks!

@zimler zimler closed this as completed Jul 22, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants