process names

[bltzr]

as of 2.0a3, the renaming of processes seems to be broken

also, shouldn't we add a (editable) name field on the top of the inspector, instead of just displaying the name and letting the user guess that they have to double click in the Objects window ?

related to #738 and #736

[jcelerier]

also, shouldn't we add a (editable) name field on the top of the inspector, instead of just displaying the name and letting the user guess that they have to double click in the Objects window ?

about this, I would rather remove the "name" field in the inspector and only keep the ability to rename in the object window actually :

[bltzr]

are you sure that's intuitive enough to only be able to rename it in the Objects window ? What if someone close the Objects window ?
Is that much more complicated to edit it in both places ?

[jcelerier]

are you sure that's intuitive enough to only be able to rename it in the Objects window ?

well, every software that I know of with a similar "object" windows does it like this.

What if someone close the Objects window ?

the same can be said of "what if someone closes the inspector" or "both". They can be reopened.

Is that much more complicated to edit it in both places ?

no, but I think that it adds clutter in the UI

[bltzr]

ok, agreed