Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Containerized rsync? Blegh #2

Closed
wdoekes opened this issue May 31, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Containerized rsync? Blegh #2

wdoekes opened this issue May 31, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@wdoekes
Copy link
Member

wdoekes commented May 31, 2017

If runc can run containerized children in the django-q rsync children, then ok.

If we need a dockerd to pass stuff along to, then we'll have to kill django-q which would be stupid overhead with processes doing absolutely nothing more than wait for other remote processes.

Creating a superminimal xenial image for only rsync+ssh still feels superbloated. Note that we may need to create other images for zvol/zfssendrecv backups too.
@wdoekes
Copy link
Member Author

wdoekes commented May 7, 2020

No

@wdoekes wdoekes closed this as completed May 7, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@wdoekes