Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use a list of Hypothesis groups instead of just one #9

Closed
Ninjani opened this issue Jun 6, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #101
Closed

Use a list of Hypothesis groups instead of just one #9

Ninjani opened this issue Jun 6, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #101
Labels
enhancement New feature or request medium

Comments

@Ninjani
Copy link
Member

Ninjani commented Jun 6, 2020

A single Hypothesis group is used to pull annotations. Maybe a user would want multiple for different subjects. These can then be used in the annotation template and in the hierarchy configuration.

@Ninjani Ninjani added enhancement New feature or request medium labels Jun 6, 2020
@mpr1255
Copy link

mpr1255 commented Dec 31, 2023

Yes! +1 for this. Kagi'd it specifically and found this. Right now I will be hacking some CLI workarounds to do this -- each group in a different top-level folder, for example. Anyway this would be a most welcome feature. Also -- not just a list but an 'all' option -- that would be ideal.

@Ninjani
Copy link
Member Author

Ninjani commented Dec 31, 2023

Added in PR #101 - should already work with gooseberry config group as expected, but needs some testing and README updates

@mpr1255
Copy link

mpr1255 commented Jan 1, 2024

Incredible. So fast. Thank you!! I managed to clone, checkout, and build that version and ran it and the behaviour is exactly as expected, especially with the hierarchical ordering of group_name/title etc. Just brilliant. This saved me from a nutty workaround I had all planned: hit the API to get a list of groups, filter out 'Public', create a gooseberry config.toml for each... etc. etc. Thanks so much. Massively increases usability.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request medium
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants