-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Not working as expected when commenting multiple changed hunks in file #14
Comments
Hi @owenrumney Do you think you can take a look to this issue? Thanks. |
I'm away till Sunday but have made a note to take a look then. I think I understand the scenario so will try and reproduce then fix |
I have a small fix for this but unable to test it, I will create the pr today |
Hey @owenrumney! Do you think we can help somehow with this? There's an issue and I think many people are waiting for the fix. |
I have been trying to make use of the feature and I have hit this issue when attempting to use the tf-sec-commentor action |
I'll take a look at the fix that was PR'd shortly. It's my understanding that aqua are not long support tfsec or any of the associated tooling like the PR commenter. I think even when this is resolved here, it won't make it's way to tfsec commenter - Just fyi |
released as v0.1.3 - good luck with getting it into tfsec |
Thanks @owenrumney, appreciate it. |
@owenrumney thanks a lot!
But you're the main contributor there or am I wrong? 😑 |
I was, till I left Aqua and lost my access |
Describe the bug
If there is a one part is changed in file and you try to add a comment there it works but if there is a multiple changes hunks and you try to add a comment in second hunk library says it is not in pr.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
Library should create the comment on the last line
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: