Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Further analysis of initial results #32

Open
owocki opened this issue Apr 1, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Further analysis of initial results #32

owocki opened this issue Apr 1, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@owocki
Copy link
Owner

owocki commented Apr 1, 2016

My test portfolio was initialized with a 1 BTC deposit, and after 2 months and 23,413 trades, exited with 0.955 BTC. The system paid 2.486 BTC in fees to poloniex.

Investigate whether I was lucky or good at trading.

  1. Were my results just because ETH had a spectacular rise ( Ideas for managing fees #5 (comment) ) ?
  2. How would my results have changed if I was on a low/no-volume exchange?

Bonus points
3. How does this affect how we should robustly backtest our trading algos against past data?

@owocki
Copy link
Owner Author

owocki commented Apr 6, 2016

arghh.. i typed up several paragraphs on and submitted it yesterday and it's gone now. i wonder if the flaky internet on the 🚌 ate it. will try to submit something new soon.

@jeff-hykin
Copy link

If I feel especially inclined to think about statistics (which I often am) I may devise some general tests for measuring luck vs skill. If they work they’d be useful for measuring the real profitability of future versions as well as the past.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants