Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Molinari vs CanIMogIt #111

Closed
griddark opened this issue Jul 19, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Molinari vs CanIMogIt #111

griddark opened this issue Jul 19, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@griddark
Copy link

Not sure which addon is causing the error, but the error is already posted on CanIMogIt page, but just incase, sorry if this isn't something you can do anything about. :)

Describe the bug
There seems to be a conflict between Molinari and CanIMogIt?

How to reproduce
Install the addon's together.

Error Message
Message: Interface/AddOns/CanIMogIt/Overlay/Tradeskill.lua:59: attempt to index field 'ProfessionsFrame' (a nil value)
Time: Sun Jul 16 18:02:11 2023
Count: 1
Stack: Interface/AddOns/CanIMogIt/Overlay/Tradeskill.lua:59: attempt to index field 'ProfessionsFrame' (a nil value)
[string "@Interface/AddOns/CanIMogIt/Overlay/Tradeskill.lua"]:59: in function func' [string "@Interface/AddOns/CanIMogIt/options.lua"]:185: in function <Interface/AddOns/CanIMogIt/options.lua:174> [string "=[C]"]: ? [string "=[C]"]: in function OpenTradeSkill'
[string "@Interface/AddOns/Molinari/hack.lua"]:61: in function <Interface/AddOns/Molinari/hack.lua:54>

Locals: event = "TRADE_SKILL_SHOW"
(*temporary) = nil
(*temporary) = nil
(*temporary) = nil
(*temporary) = nil
(*temporary) = nil
(*temporary) = "attempt to index field 'ProfessionsFrame' (a nil value)"

@p3lim
Copy link
Member

p3lim commented Jul 19, 2023

Tell the author of CanIMogIt to check if ProfessionsFrame exists before referencing it (or better yet wait for Blizzard_Professions addon to load), that's on them not Molinari.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants