-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
What about names types? #23
Comments
Yes. That is a great idea. Haskell supports it with records. There was another discussion that among other things was about such a feature. As described here I actually implemented it. I never got it finished up though :( |
Awesome! 👍 |
I don't think unfinished unmerged code is particularly awesome ;) What do you think about the features in the branch? Anything you like or don't like? Anything you'd still be missing? Would you use it? If so I should finish it up, merge it in and do a release. |
haha. I was just commending the work in progress. It looks good to me -- I wouldnt worry about enumeration. I'm not using union-type yet, but I'm inspired to from looking at your functional frontend examples. This was the only part holding me back. |
It seems like names types might be easier to work with.
When types get more and more complicated it, I'd image it gets pretty hard to keep track of the order of everything. Any reason you decided to stick with arrays? I understand haskell seems to do it that way...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: