Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pd.Timestamp(timestamp) looses freq #22311

Closed
toobaz opened this issue Aug 13, 2018 · 2 comments · Fixed by #23503
Closed

pd.Timestamp(timestamp) looses freq #22311

toobaz opened this issue Aug 13, 2018 · 2 comments · Fixed by #23503
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@toobaz
Copy link
Member

toobaz commented Aug 13, 2018

Code Sample, a copy-pastable example if possible

In [2]: print(pd.Timestamp(pd.Timestamp('2010-08-08', freq='D')).freq)
None

Problem description

I expect a timestamp initialized from a timestamp to keep its properties. And indeeed:

In [3]: print(pd.Timestamp(pd.Timestamp('2010-08-08', tz='utc')).tz)
UTC

Expected Output

'D'

Output of pd.show_versions()

INSTALLED VERSIONS

commit: 9123f7d
python: 3.5.3.final.0
python-bits: 64
OS: Linux
OS-release: 4.9.0-6-amd64
machine: x86_64
processor:
byteorder: little
LC_ALL: None
LANG: it_IT.UTF-8
LOCALE: it_IT.UTF-8

pandas: 0.24.0.dev0+457.g9123f7d0b
pytest: 3.5.0
pip: 9.0.1
setuptools: 39.2.0
Cython: 0.28.4
numpy: 1.14.3
scipy: 0.19.0
pyarrow: None
xarray: None
IPython: 6.2.1
sphinx: 1.5.6
patsy: 0.5.0
dateutil: 2.7.3
pytz: 2018.4
blosc: None
bottleneck: 1.2.0dev
tables: 3.3.0
numexpr: 2.6.1
feather: 0.3.1
matplotlib: 2.2.2.post1634.dev0+ge8120cf6d
openpyxl: 2.3.0
xlrd: 1.0.0
xlwt: 1.3.0
xlsxwriter: 0.9.6
lxml: 4.1.1
bs4: 4.5.3
html5lib: 0.999999999
sqlalchemy: 1.0.15
pymysql: None
psycopg2: None
jinja2: 2.10
s3fs: None
fastparquet: None
pandas_gbq: None
pandas_datareader: 0.2.1
gcsfs: None

@alimcmaster1
Copy link
Member

I can potentially have a look at this @toobaz , unless you have already started?

@toobaz
Copy link
Member Author

toobaz commented Aug 28, 2018

I can potentially have a look at this @toobaz , unless you have already started?

Feel free, I didn't start, and don't plan to do so soon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants