Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Link error on compiling #5

Closed
PlasmaDev5 opened this issue Jan 30, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Link error on compiling #5

PlasmaDev5 opened this issue Jan 30, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@PlasmaDev5
Copy link

PlasmaDev5 commented Jan 30, 2018

I have just pulled the latest and attempted to compile although i ended up with a link error. i followed all the instructions on the compile page

assimp.lib(IFCUtil.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __std_reverse_trivially_swappable_8

@PanosK92
Copy link
Owner

Hello,

Hard to tell why it throws this linking error. It compiles fine for most people so the problem should be localized. The pre-compiled library was built with VS17 using Update 3 if I recall correctly, so this is a potential cause taking into account that in one of the next versions they did some std related changes.

In any case, I'll recompile and commit a fresh Assimp library tomorrow (I'll comment here).
In the meantime, you might have some luck trying to download and compile Assimp yourself.

@PanosK92
Copy link
Owner

You can grab latest now, you'll get an assimp library built with the latest version of VS.
If the problem persists, it's localized. Please keep me updated ;-)

FYI: Ideally the generated solution should include all dependencies as projects so they get compiled on the spot. This feature is not a first class citizent but I'll try to make it happen in the following months.

@PlasmaDev5
Copy link
Author

that seams to have fixed everything, thanks.

@PanosK92
Copy link
Owner

PanosK92 commented Feb 1, 2018

No problem. Just a quick reminder though, the engine is still at early development stage (plus the editor is being written from scratch again), don't expect anything fancy yet.

@PanosK92 PanosK92 closed this as completed Feb 1, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants