Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prepare the 1.2.0 release. #352

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jan 23, 2017
Merged

Conversation

jsirois
Copy link
Member

@jsirois jsirois commented Jan 23, 2017

No description provided.

@jsirois jsirois mentioned this pull request Jan 23, 2017
@jsirois jsirois requested a review from kwlzn January 23, 2017 21:36
Copy link
Contributor

@kwlzn kwlzn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm w/ a couple of thoughts on the range selection.


PACKAGING_REQUIREMENT = 'packaging>=16.8,<17.0'
SETUPTOOLS_REQUIREMENT = 'setuptools>=30.0,<35.0'
Copy link
Contributor

@kwlzn kwlzn Jan 23, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I noticed in the changelog that the 34.0.0 version of setuptools is the first release that forgoes it's previously vendored deps in favor of typical dep linkages - but it seems there's a slight chicken/egg scenario here based on their strong advice to always use pip to install that made me wonder if this will break things for pex? may be good to do some extra tire kicking around setuptools==34.0.0 in particular.

also, I wonder if it'd make sense to relax the lower end of this range a bit - perhaps early in the 2x.0.0 series (e.g. setuptools>=20.0,<35.0) - just to ensure flexibility for other composed libs in the same environment which may not be prepared for 30.x (which was just released in Dec '16).

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

... made me wonder if this will break things for pex?

I think you meant pants, and agreed - not sure. Suggestions incorporated.

Exclude >=34 for now since it potentially changes install behavior of pex when used as a lib and relax the lower bound to be modern, but not overly so.
@jsirois jsirois merged commit 66ba1fb into pex-tool:master Jan 23, 2017
@jsirois jsirois deleted the jsirois/deps/modernize branch January 23, 2017 22:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants