Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 6, 2020. It is now read-only.

Backports to beta #7660

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Jan 23, 2018
Merged

Backports to beta #7660

merged 6 commits into from Jan 23, 2018

Conversation

debris
Copy link
Collaborator

@debris debris commented Jan 22, 2018

andresilva and others added 6 commits January 22, 2018 11:30
@andresilva @debris
Improve handling of RocksDB corruption (#7630)
82cb1e5 
* kvdb-rocksdb: update rust-rocksdb version

* kvdb-rocksdb: mark corruptions and attempt repair on db open

* kvdb-rocksdb: better corruption detection on open

* kvdb-rocksdb: add corruption_file_name const

* kvdb-rocksdb: rename mark_corruption to check_for_corruption
@tomusdrw @debris
Hardening of CSP (#7621)
2546af2
@debris
Fixed delegatecall's from/to (#7568)
446f0da 
* Fixed delegatecall's from/to, closes #7166

* added tests for delegatecall traces, #7167
@tomusdrw @debris
Light client RPCs (#7603)
261fd57 
* Implement registrar.

* Implement eth_getCode

* Don't wait for providers.

* Don't wait for providers.

* Fix linting and wasm tests.
@yrashk @debris
Problem: AttachedProtocols don't get registered (#7610)
470bd6c 
I was investigating issues I am having with Whisper support. I've
enabled Whisper on a custom test network and inserted traces into
Whisper handler implementation (Network<T> and NetworkProtocolHandler
for Network<T>) and I noticed that the handler was never invoked.

After further research on this matter, I found out that
AttachedProtocol's register function does nothing:
https://github.com/paritytech/parity/blob/master/sync/src/api.rs#L172
but there was an implementation originally:
99075ad#diff-5212acb6bcea60e9804ba7b50f6fe6ec and it did the actual
expected logic of registering the protocol in the NetworkService.

However, as of 16d84f8#diff-5212acb6bcea60e9804ba7b50f6fe6ec ("finished
removing ipc") this implementation is gone and only the no-op function
is left.

Which leads me to a conclusion that in fact Whisper's handler never gets
registered in the service and therefore two nodes won't communicate
using it.

Solution: Resurrect original non-empty `AttachedProtocols.register`
implementation

Resolves #7566
@tomusdrw @debris
Fix Temporarily Invalid blocks handling (#7613)
44fa2cb 
* Handle temporarily invalid blocks in sync.

* Fix tests.
@debris debris added A0-pleasereview 🤓 Pull request needs code review. A8-backport 🕸 Pull request is already reviewed well in another branch. labels Jan 22, 2018
@5chdn 5chdn added this to the 1.9 milestone Jan 22, 2018
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 22, 2018 •
edited

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (beta@97ed569). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 84.43%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             beta    #7660   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   81.45%           
=======================================
  Files           ?      714           
  Lines           ?    85323           
  Branches        ?      185           
=======================================
  Hits            ?    69502           
  Misses          ?    15821           
  Partials        ?        0
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
ethcore/evm/src/lib.rs 100% <ø> (ø)
ethcore/src/engines/instant_seal.rs 81.25% <ø> (ø)
parity/main.rs 100% <ø> (ø)
ethcore/light/src/net/request_set.rs 75.82% <ø> (ø)
ethcore/src/executed.rs 22.8% <ø> (ø)
ethcore/wasm/src/lib.rs 85.71% <ø> (ø)
ethcore/src/engines/tendermint/mod.rs 84.1% <ø> (ø)
json/src/spec/ethash.rs 99.24% <ø> (ø)
ethcore/src/verification/queue/mod.rs 89.72% <ø> (ø)
ipfs/src/lib.rs 90.9% <ø> (ø)
... and 203 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 97ed569...44fa2cb. Read the comment docs.

@5chdn 5chdn added the M4-core ⛓ Core client code / Rust. label Jan 22, 2018
@5chdn 5chdn merged commit fa6a0a6 into beta Jan 23, 2018
@5chdn 5chdn deleted the backports_to_beta branch January 23, 2018 11:32
@tomusdrw tomusdrw mentioned this pull request Jan 29, 2018
Merged
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
A0-pleasereview 🤓 Pull request needs code review. A8-backport 🕸 Pull request is already reviewed well in another branch. M4-core ⛓ Core client code / Rust.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.9 Velocity
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
6 participants
@debris @codecov-io @5chdn @andresilva @tomusdrw @yrashk