Back-comment doesn't work after a variable of that has a "procedure ... of object" type

[michaliskambi]

Submitted on https://sourceforge.net/p/pasdoc/bugs/92/ .

Original description:

---

If you place a pasdoc comment like this:

{Placeholder for pointer to procedure in main thread.}
readInfo : procedure(Info : TEventMessage) of object;

it will work. However, the alternativ with backpointer like:

readInfo : procedure(Info : TEventMessage) of object; //< Placeholder for pointer to procedure in main thread.}

will not. Without the "of object" spesification, it does work.

Regards Bent Vangli

---

Michalis can reproduce it indeed, with this testcase:

unit ok_back_comment_procvar;
interface
var
  readInfo : procedure(Info : TEventMessage) of object; //< Something something.
implementation
end.

The output is:

$ bin/pasdoc /tmp/ok_back_comment_procvar.pas 
PasDoc 0.15.0 [2018-02-08|FPC 3.0.4|Linux|64]
Documentation generator for Pascal source

This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Info[1]:    Starting Source File Parsing ...
Info[2]:    Now parsing file /tmp/ok_back_comment_procvar.pas...
Warning[1]: /tmp/ok_back_comment_procvar.pas(4): This is a back-comment (comment starting with "<") but there is no item declared right before it: " Something something."
Info[2]:    ... 1 Source File(s) parsed
Info[2]:    Creating links ...
Info[2]:    ...  links created
Info[2]:    Expanding descriptions (pass 1) ...
Info[2]:    Expanding descriptions (pass 2) ...
Info[2]:    ... Descriptions expanded
Info[2]:    Writing Docs for unit "ok_back_comment_procvar"
Info[1]:    Done

.. and readInfo indeed has no documentation.

[Fr0sT-Brutal]

How about recent version?

[michaliskambi]

I reproduced this with latest PasDoc code from GitHub, today.

( Yeah, the version line with PasDoc 0.15.0 [2018-02-08... is misleading, that's just version number and date hardcoded, corresponding to the last release. )

[Fr0sT-Brutal]

Ok, the date has cheated me :)