Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.3.1] [minor, UI] More uniform UI language in "consumption-view" #768

Closed
stheid opened this issue Aug 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

[3.3.1] [minor, UI] More uniform UI language in "consumption-view" #768

stheid opened this issue Aug 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@stheid
Copy link

stheid commented Aug 30, 2023

In many ui elements there are two buttons, one for consumption, one for opening. However in the main consumption view there is just one button paired with a tickbox. That was quite confusing for me

currently highlighted requested change
signal-2023-08-30-092143 signal-2023-08-30-092235 signal-2023-08-30-092143_3
@stheid stheid changed the title [minor] [UI] More uniform UI language in "consumption-view" [3.31] [minor] [UI] More uniform UI language in "consumption-view" Aug 30, 2023
@stheid stheid changed the title [3.31] [minor] [UI] More uniform UI language in "consumption-view" [3.31] [minor, UI] More uniform UI language in "consumption-view" Aug 30, 2023
@stheid stheid changed the title [3.31] [minor, UI] More uniform UI language in "consumption-view" [3.3.1] [minor, UI] More uniform UI language in "consumption-view" Aug 30, 2023
@patzly
Copy link
Owner

patzly commented Aug 30, 2023

Thanks! Sadly it's not possible to have multible Floating Action Buttons in Material 3, the design language we use. Instead we would add an icon action to the left menu.

@patzly patzly added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 30, 2023
@stheid
Copy link
Author

stheid commented Aug 30, 2023

having it on the left menu and removed from the list would definetly be an improvement in the visual language. If this is the compromise with the current framework so be it.

Can you link the respective source file that needs to be changed here? i am curious. if i find time i might do a PR

@dominiczedler dominiczedler self-assigned this Dec 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants