license clarification

[lebedov]

It appears that coopy is distributable under the GPL license while daff is distributable under the MIT license. However, daff appears to contain code from coopy. Does this imply that any coopy code in daff is dual licensed under the GPL and MIT licenses?

[paulfitz]

The core of daff is a reimplementation of algorithms in coopy. It is a rewrite, under the MIT license. I'm also the original author of coopy. Happy to take any steps to clarify ambiguities in licensing that you see.

[lebedov]

Thanks! Just wanted to confirm because I am evaluating whether daff could be be useful in implementing a feature in some code I am working on that will released under the BSD license.