You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First, I sincerely appreciate for the properly working BVP/ECG analysis codes you shared.
I have a question about the frequency domain result.
When I try to analyze BVP data with very long length (>3hrs),
The result shows EXTREAMLY large value for hf and lf power (line 44).
But the lf/hf makes sense, and the value is reasonable if I divide it by 1000^2 (maybe for ms^2).
Would you let me know what is the unit of raw HF, LF and is it correct to divide it by 1000^2 for get the trivial ms^2 result?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@paulvangentcom
Thanks. I am little confused what 'raw area-under-curve for the frequency range' means.
So, to convert ms^2 metric, should I divide it with (1000*1000)? Or the equation should be changed based on my sampling rate?
First, I sincerely appreciate for the properly working BVP/ECG analysis codes you shared.
![PastedGraphic-1](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/28276515/92339137-907a3700-f0ef-11ea-8c54-735416647d62.png)
I have a question about the frequency domain result.
When I try to analyze BVP data with very long length (>3hrs),
The result shows EXTREAMLY large value for hf and lf power (line 44).
But the lf/hf makes sense, and the value is reasonable if I divide it by 1000^2 (maybe for ms^2).
Would you let me know what is the unit of raw HF, LF and is it correct to divide it by 1000^2 for get the trivial ms^2 result?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: