Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GetColumnNames() 64 char limit #33

Closed
RandomUniqueName opened this issue Jan 21, 2014 · 7 comments
Closed

GetColumnNames() 64 char limit #33

RandomUniqueName opened this issue Jan 21, 2014 · 7 comments

Comments

@RandomUniqueName
Copy link

Hi,

I am currently using the GetColumnNames() and it works great except for the fact that there is a char limit on the string it returns of 64. Is there a way I can make that limit a lot higher or set it to unlimited?

Kind regards,

RandomUniquename

@paulyoder
Copy link
Owner

Sorry, not that I know of.

Paul

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:52 AM, RandomUniqueName
notifications@github.comwrote:

Hi,

I am currently using the GetColumnNames() and it works great except for
the fact that there is a char limit on the string it returns of 64. Is
there a way I can make that limit a lot higher or set it to unlimited?

Kind regards,

RandomUniquename


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/33
.

@RandomUniqueName
Copy link
Author

Could I maybe get the same functionality another way? I know the cells are
always on the first row.

Thanks for the quick response anyway. I might be able to work with this limitation. Luckily it does not apply the 64 char limit to normal cells.

RandomUniquename

2014/1/21 Paul Yoder notifications@github.com

Sorry, not that I know of.

Paul

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:52 AM, RandomUniqueName
notifications@github.comwrote:

Hi,

I am currently using the GetColumnNames() and it works great except for
the fact that there is a char limit on the string it returns of 64. Is
there a way I can make that limit a lot higher or set it to unlimited?

Kind regards,

RandomUniquename


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/paulyoder/LinqToExcel/issues/33>
.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/33#issuecomment-32872190
.

@paulyoder
Copy link
Owner

paulyoder commented Jan 22, 2014

Hi RandomUniquename,

You should be able to use the WorksheetNoHeader() method to loop through
the cells on the first row. Here's the documentation:
https://github.com/paulyoder/LinqToExcel#query-a-worksheet-without-a-header-row

Paul

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:56 AM, RandomUniqueName
notifications@github.comwrote:

Could I maybe get the same functionality another way? I know the cells are
always on the first row.

2014/1/21 Paul Yoder notifications@github.com

Sorry, not that I know of.

Paul

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:52 AM, RandomUniqueName
notifications@github.comwrote:

Hi,

I am currently using the GetColumnNames() and it works great except
for
the fact that there is a char limit on the string it returns of 64. Is
there a way I can make that limit a lot higher or set it to unlimited?

Kind regards,

RandomUniquename


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/paulyoder/LinqToExcel/issues/33>
.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/paulyoder/LinqToExcel/issues/33#issuecomment-32872190>
.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/33#issuecomment-32872740
.

@RandomUniqueName
Copy link
Author

Hi Paul,

Thanks, I tried that myself, but I can't seem to figure out how to get all the cells on the first row in a list. An example of this would be greatly appreciated. I'm still learning LINQ.

RandomUniqueName

p.s. Could you remove my name from your last post? I used mail to send that post not knowing it would be public here.

@RandomUniqueName
Copy link
Author

RandomUniqueName commented Jun 7, 2019

@paulyoder could you maybe delete my name from your last post now? I think I have waited long enough for it. ;) (Don' forget to delete the previous edit version please.) Also this issue can be closed as its not relevant anymore.

@paulyoder
Copy link
Owner

@RandomUniqueName done! :-)

@RandomUniqueName
Copy link
Author

Thanks! On another note, nice to see we still had some courtesies like in mail on GitHub back in good old 2014. 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants