Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

asadmin doesn't consider jacc-provider properties #2348

Closed
tomaszbembnista opened this issue Feb 1, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

asadmin doesn't consider jacc-provider properties #2348

tomaszbembnista opened this issue Feb 1, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
Type: Bug Label issue as a bug defect
Milestone

Comments

@tomaszbembnista
Copy link

Description


JACC-Provider created with the asadmin command create-jacc-provider has no properties specified in command.

Expected Outcome

The specified properties should be added to JACC provider

Current Outcome

The specified properties are not considered

Steps to reproduce (Only for bug reports)

1 -** Start the domain

./asadmin start-domain payaradomain

2 -** Configure an JACC-Provider:

./asadmin create-jacc-provider --policyproviderclass com.mydomain.PolicyProvider --
policyconfigfactoryclass com.mydomain.PolicyConfigurationFactory --property abc=cdf jaac_provider

3 -** Take a look at domain.xml configuration. The created provider has no properties.

Environment

  • Payara Docker Image: payara/server-full 175
@smillidge
Copy link
Contributor

See https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/payara-forum/GqxY_gFE8n8 this has been reproduced by @OndrejM

@smillidge
Copy link
Contributor

Created internal issue with ID PAYARA-2483

@smillidge smillidge added Type: Bug Label issue as a bug defect v:Payara-4 labels Feb 18, 2018
@smillidge
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed by #2448

@OndroMih OndroMih added this to the Payara 5.181 milestone Mar 20, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Bug Label issue as a bug defect
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants