Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Verify member visibility is consistent with Java implementation, fix where necessary #74

Open
pboyer opened this issue Oct 17, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Verify member visibility is consistent with Java implementation, fix where necessary #74

pboyer opened this issue Oct 17, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@pboyer
Copy link
Owner

pboyer commented Oct 17, 2016 •
edited
Loading

It's possible this could be done by establishing a source level correspondence between the two implementations. This likely would help with #66
@pboyer pboyer changed the title Verify member visibility is consistent with Java implementation Verify member visibility is consistent with Java implementation, fix if necessary Oct 17, 2016
@pboyer pboyer changed the title Verify member visibility is consistent with Java implementation, fix if necessary Verify member visibility is consistent with Java implementation, fix where necessary Oct 17, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@pboyer