Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nuisance parameters #23

Open
taqtiqa-mark opened this issue Mar 23, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Nuisance parameters #23

taqtiqa-mark opened this issue Mar 23, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@taqtiqa-mark
Copy link

taqtiqa-mark commented Mar 23, 2024

As best I can tell nuisance parameters are present.
This appears when the SS model is represented as a taylor series, so this is likely only evident via some type of limit calculations.
Intrestingly, it also appears nuisance parameters may arise within the FP model when considered on its own. I leave the authors to work out the details either way.

The following elements will need to be modified to address these explicitly:

  • Simulation code
  • Estimation code
  • UI web elements (particular care is due here to avoid harming unsuspecting users)
  • User documents (as above)
@peilun-he
Copy link
Owner

Dear Prof. Van de Vyver,

Many thanks for your comments. I am currently working on them and I should be able to address them in my reply. For this concerned, I understand that a new problem emerged while testing PDSim? May I please know what combinations of parameters (or parameters) are causing a problem?

Thank you.

@taqtiqa-mark
Copy link
Author

Happy to be shown to be wrong... Doesn't setting various of the $\alpha_i =0$ have the effect of 'knocking out' some of the other parameters?

@peilun-he
Copy link
Owner

For the polynomial diffusion model, setting $\alpha_2 = \alpha_4 = \alpha_5=0$ results in the short-term factor $\chi_t$ disappearing from the spot price equation. Consequently, the spot price and the futures prices become solely dependent on the long-term factor $\xi_t$. Consequently, the parameters associated with $\chi_t$, namely $\kappa, \sigma_{\chi}$, and $\lambda_{\chi}$, do not influence the futures curve in this scenario. This explains the observation of certain parameters "disappearing".

@taqtiqa-mark
Copy link
Author

Correct, as I pointed out, you have this issue that needs to be addressed. These are nuisance parameters and in general they impact estimation. I believe you need to address these estimation effects - there is an extensive literature on this and hopefully you won't have to create too many new results?

In addition these parameters affects the choices that naive users are allowed to make. So this also needs to be reflected in the HTML page UI elements. As well as the unit test suite for those UI elements.

@peilun-he
Copy link
Owner

Hi @taqtiqa-mark thanks for pointing this out. We have added a few error checks to handle this situation. If users set $\alpha_2 = \alpha_4 = \alpha_5 = 0$ (or similarly, $\alpha_3 = \alpha_5 = \alpha_6 = 0$), a modal dialog with an error message is thrown.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants