Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

first 5 epoch , test_acc1=0 #7

Closed
eeric opened this issue Aug 19, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

first 5 epoch , test_acc1=0 #7

eeric opened this issue Aug 19, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@eeric
Copy link

eeric commented Aug 19, 2021

{"train_lr": 0.0006003999999998758, "train_loss_0": 5.2468776138196835, "train_loss_1": 5.2314488993825545, "test_loss": 12.697948946271623, "test_loss_0": 6.487931878226144, "test_loss_1": 6.210017108917237, "test_acc1": 0.0, "test_acc1_head1": 0.0, "test_acc1_head2": 0.0, "epoch": 4, "n_parameters": 77557992}

@pengzhiliang
Copy link
Owner

I'm sorry that something wrong has happened in your experiment.

On the ImageNet1k, if using conformer_small_path16, the log is:

{"train_lr": 1.000000000000014e-06, "train_loss_0": 3.479622867107391, "train_loss_1": 3.475991682386398, "test_loss": 6.931091730831233, "test_loss_0": 3.4690902396922803, "test_loss_1": 3.4620015056988667, "test_acc1": 0.1160000015258789, "test_acc1_head1": 0.11200000076293945, "test_acc1_head2": 0.1640000033569336, "epoch": 0, "n_parameters": 37673424}
{"train_lr": 0.001600200000000024, "train_loss_0": 2.916393296575546, "train_loss_1": 3.0137832653045655, "test_loss": 4.195239642194209, "test_loss_0": 2.0028400967139324, "test_loss_1": 2.192399521820418, "test_acc1": 22.068000575561523, "test_acc1_head1": 21.402000715332033, "test_acc1_head2": 17.656000471191405, "epoch": 5, "n_parameters": 37673424}

And I notice that the 'n_parameters' in your log is 77.5M, which is neither conformer_small parameter nor a parameter of conformer_base

{"train_lr": 0.0006003999999998758, "train_loss_0": 5.2468776138196835, "train_loss_1": 5.2314488993825545, "test_loss": 12.697948946271623, "test_loss_0": 6.487931878226144, "test_loss_1": 6.210017108917237, "test_acc1": 0.0, "test_acc1_head1": 0.0, "test_acc1_head2": 0.0, "epoch": 4, "n_parameters": 77557992}

So, have you changed the network or dataset?

@eeric
Copy link
Author

eeric commented Aug 19, 2021

I used face dataset, I guess label was not consistence

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants