You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Shouldn't clients be given a /32 subnet mask in their configs? Or, at the very least, could the admins have the option to set that? Right now, I set my server to have a 192.168.42.1/24 subnet, and clients each inherit successive 192.168.42.x/24 values for the Address directive in their configs. Assuming we want clients to stay on the same IP (we certainly do), shouldn't that be a /32 on each client config, and not /24?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Only the mask on AllowedIPs on the server matters for that IP restriction, as it will reject any traffic not originating from a matching IP, and that's set to /32. The /24 in the clients Address will only result in a direct route to the 192.168.42.0/24 network being created on the client.
Shouldn't clients be given a /32 subnet mask in their configs? Or, at the very least, could the admins have the option to set that? Right now, I set my server to have a
192.168.42.1/24
subnet, and clients each inherit successive192.168.42.x/24
values for theAddress
directive in their configs. Assuming we want clients to stay on the same IP (we certainly do), shouldn't that be a/32
on each client config, and not/24
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: