We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(reported by Tobias Grosser) pluto compiled durbin from polybench 3.2 crashes at execution
(explanation by Uday Bondhugula) the reason is
There is a missing parenthesis in the generated code:
for (t3=t2;t3<=2_t2-1;t3++) { y[-t2+t3][t2]=y[-t2+t3][t2-1]+alpha[t2]_y[t2- -t2+t3-1][t2-1];; ^^^^^ }
since the remappings are:
k = t2 i = t3-t2
It should've been "t2- (-t2+t3)-1]
Can you quickly look at the thread above? It should make sense to you quickly. Given this, why shouldn't the remappings be not generated as:
S8(t2, (t3-t2))
instead of
S8(t2, t3-t2);
?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
(reported by Tobias Grosser)
pluto compiled durbin from polybench 3.2 crashes at execution
(explanation by Uday Bondhugula)
the reason is
There is a missing parenthesis in the generated code:
for (t3=t2;t3<=2_t2-1;t3++) {
y[-t2+t3][t2]=y[-t2+t3][t2-1]+alpha[t2]_y[t2- -t2+t3-1][t2-1];;
^^^^^
}
since the remappings are:
k = t2
i = t3-t2
It should've been "t2- (-t2+t3)-1]
Can you quickly look at the thread above? It should make sense to you quickly. Given this, why shouldn't the remappings be not generated as:
S8(t2, (t3-t2))
instead of
S8(t2, t3-t2);
?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: