Is true or false

[ufobat]

Added Features to test in boolean context.
This addresses #8 and #18

[AlexDaniel]

So you added is-true, is-false, is-so, is-not. What's the justification for introducing these? Looks like bloat to me.

[AlexDaniel]

Ah… I see, there's no other easy/obvious way to check for Truthy/Falsey values?

[ufobat]

There is. You could do a is $expression, *.so;.

I would discourage ppl from doing so, because as described in #20 I am not aware of a way generate a propper test case description with WhateverCode because

1. $whatevercode.perl is represended as { ... } and
2. $whatevercode($got) applys the whatevercode and returns it, but doesnt tell what whatever is looking for.

[ufobat]

If we considder #18 as a duplicate of #8 I would suggest to use is-so and is-not because is-true sounds as if we would do a $got === True. so and not are used to enforce a boolean context.

[AlexDaniel]

And there's also #6 which suggests to rename is-run to runs… Following that logic, maybe ok is not too bad. Don't know if this bikeshedding is worth it, but I do think that more obvious routine names is a good thing in a long run.

[AlexDaniel]

I think ok and nok make sense for now. It's possible that we'll come up with better names, but if we want to create a mostly drop-in replacement for Test, I think it's not wrong to have ok and nok.

Feel free to merge this yourself.