Some small, mainly typographic, changes to the FAQ

doc/Language/faq.pod6

@@ -868,10 +868,10 @@ to the JIT that other dynamic languages don't, we think we'll have a lot of
 headroom for performance improvements.
 
 The following crude benchmarks, with all the usual caveats about such things,
-show that Perl 6 can be faster than Perl 5 for similar tasks if
-the big weaponry is included; at the same time, Perl 5 can be faster
-if only the bare bones are included. Similar situation can be observed
-when comparing Perl 6 to other languages.
+show that Perl 6 can be faster than Perl 5 for similar tasks if the big weaponry
+is included, that is, if Perl 6 features are used to its full extent; at the
+same time, Perl 5 can be faster if only the bare bones are included. Similar
+situation can be observed when comparing Perl 6 to other languages.
 
 Try it on your system. You may be pleasantly surprised!
 
@@ -921,17 +921,18 @@ Examples:
     1;
     =end code
 
-    =begin code
-    # A perl program which works under both perl5 (with perl -Mbigint)
-    # and perl6
+You might want to use this program for comparing performance, too. It works
+under both languages, as long as C<perl -Mbigint> is used for invocation for
+Perl 5.
 
-    my ($prev, $current) = (1, 0);
+=begin code
+my ($prev, $current) = (1, 0);
 
-    for (0..100_000) {
-        ($prev, $current) = ($current, $prev + $current);
-    }
-    print $current;
-    =end code
+for (0..100_000) {
+    ($prev, $current) = ($current, $prev + $current);
+}
+print $current;
+=end code
 
 =end pod