Clarify appearances of 'fat comma' refs #2520

Author: JJ

doc/Language/5to6-nutshell.pod6

@@ -620,8 +620,8 @@ a sub that expects a hashref, then the usage is likely identical.
 
 If you were using C«=>» as a convenient shortcut to not have to quote part
 of a list, or in passing arguments to a sub that expects a flat list of
-KEY, VALUE, KEY, VALUE, then continuing to use C«=>» may break your code.
-The easiest workaround is to change the fat comma to a regular comma, and
+C<KEY, VALUE, KEY, VALUE>, then continuing to use C«=>» may break your code.
+The easiest workaround is to change that I<fat arrow> to a regular comma, and
 manually add quotes to its left-hand side. Or, you can change the sub's API
 to L<slurp a hash|/type/Signature#Slurpy_(A.K.A._variadic)_parameters>.
 A better long-term solution is to change the sub's API to

doc/Language/5to6-perlop.pod6

@@ -243,11 +243,11 @@ creates L<Lists|/type/List>) or separates arguments in function
 calls. Also, there is a C<:> variant that turns function calls into
 method calls - see L<this page|/language/operators#infix_%3A>.
 
-The C<< => >> operator works similarly to the Perl 5 "fat comma"
-behavior in that it allows an unquoted identifier on its left side,
-but in Perl 6 constructs Pair objects, rather than just functioning as
-a separator. If you are trying to just literally translate a line of
-Perl 5 code to Perl 6, it should behave as expected.
+The C<< => >> operator, or I<fat arrow>, works similarly to the Perl 5 "fat
+comma" in that it allows an unquoted (ordinary) identifier on its left side, but
+in Perl 6 constructs Pair objects, rather than just functioning as a separator.
+If you are trying to just literally translate a line of Perl 5 code to Perl 6,
+it should behave as expected.
 
 =head2 List operators (rightward)