Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggest prove6 over prove #2841

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 8, 2019
Merged

Suggest prove6 over prove #2841

merged 1 commit into from Jun 8, 2019

Conversation

Altai-man
Copy link
Member


=for code :lang<shell>
$ prove --exec perl6 -r t
$ prove6 --lib t/

Copy link
Contributor

@JJ JJ Jun 8, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure you need t/ Have you tried to run it by itself?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, of course I tried to run it before constructing the command and writing about it.
The thing is, it does work without explicit t/ argument, but I wanted to be a bit more explicit about the directory with tests path.
We refer to prove6 docs here, if the user wants to customize the command, they can refer to it and construct something that is more specific. t directory is an assumption.

On toe other hand, I don't know why I omitted -e argument that has Perl 6 executor as the default one, though the situation is similar.

Copy link
Contributor

@JJ JJ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please check that?

@JJ JJ merged commit b394e9d into master Jun 8, 2019
@Altai-man Altai-man deleted the note-prove6 branch June 8, 2019 14:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants