Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[jvm] Look inside containers for parametric type #386

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

usev6
Copy link
Contributor

@usev6 usev6 commented Jan 6, 2018

Fixes some spectests (cmp. RT #132673).

Fixes some spectests (cmp. RT #132673).
@usev6
Copy link
Contributor Author

usev6 commented Jan 6, 2018

I'm not sure if this patch make sense -- but it seems to fix some roast issues on the JVM backend.

@jnthn
Copy link
Contributor

jnthn commented Jan 6, 2018

I think decont itself does the check of whether it needs to, so the iscont check here is perhaps duplicated work?

As jnthn++ pointed out, decont itself does the check of whether
it needs to decont the passed object.
@usev6
Copy link
Contributor Author

usev6 commented Jan 7, 2018

Of course, you are right. I didn't realize that decont is a noop if it gets a decontainerized argument. Thanks, jnthn!

If the addition of decont makes sense otherwise, I could as well push that change directely (avoiding the intermediate and the merge commit).

@jnthn
Copy link
Contributor

jnthn commented Jan 7, 2018

Yes, it makes sense to me.

@usev6
Copy link
Contributor Author

usev6 commented Jan 7, 2018

I commited the patch as f6bccf7 and I'm closing this PR. Thanks again!

@usev6 usev6 closed this Jan 7, 2018
@usev6 usev6 deleted the jvm_rt_132673 branch January 7, 2018 12:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants